HomeTennis coachIs Tennis Teaching Turning into Golf? Too Technical?

Comments

Is Tennis Teaching Turning into Golf? Too Technical? — 3 Comments

  1. Well, Todd, your student can’t serve a kick. What will you say to him? Correct by your own?

    Tennis is a technically complex sport. It is more challenging than golf as you do not have enough time to carefully choose what “tool” is best to apply in this situation, like it happens in golf.

    But without a proper technique your player will always lose to a player, who has the same heart & gaming skills + technique.

    My player recently played vs. American opponent, who just graduated from well-known American University, being a part of its main roster for several years. My player was 7 years younger, did not have this collegiate experience, plus player was in the 3rd week or tournaments vs. 1-week of the opponent.

    The opponent was a real athlete, with big heart & enourmous wish to fight. But after the first game I said my player just one thing: “Relax. You are playing with an amateur. Just do your daily job. You will definitely win”. It was 6:1, 6:0 for my player.

    If you do not teach your students to have a correct technique, you will produce amateurs. They can perform good even on collegiate level. But they won’t have any chance as a pro.

  2. Hi Anton,
    Thanks for your comments. In my opinion, having a solid foundation of strokes and grips are very important. This should be set at a young age. Do I fix techniques for many kids that are in their teenage years? All the time. Is it late for them to have to learn new techniques that should have been taught at a young age? Definitely. The basis of this article is coaching all over the internet and everywhere in general that has such complicated steps to hitting a tennis ball, I find to be very confusing. Many times I can’t understand or figure out a purpose of what is trying to be accomplished in a particular training session or lesson. If the junior is trained well, they can make the necessary adjustments on their own because they understand how to fix errors because their coach has done a great job teaching them the game. What you do not want is a dependency on a coach every time something goes wrong technically for juniors. It’s just more lesson money for the pro. Speaking on the technical side of tennis, Jack Sock just won the Paris Masters and there are plenty others that have such unconventional techniques, but it works for them. If some egotistical technical tennis coaching guru was to touch any of these natural strokes, it would destroy their career. Every case is different, so a good knowledgeable coach would see if the technique is a detriment to the juniors tennis. There’s only one technically perfect player ever to play tennis and that’s Roger. Teaching kids how to train, how to become better athletes and movers, have proper attitudes, and construct proper points is much more challenging then teaching technique.
    Best of luck.

    • I definitely agree with you that a pure technique should not be the only thing to be learned from any coach. Tennis is a game, and the crucial thing here is HOW TO PLAY.

      What I disagree is the moment that it can be late to fix this or that element of technique. It is never late to make your technique better… Another thing that there are so many ways to reach a goal (win a point, game, set & match). So I believe that a coach should only touch “unusual” technique element if it doesn’t work. But if it works (somewhow) – try to improve, not change because of “academic approach” 🙂