University High School’s Boys Tennis Team Won its Fourth Consecutive CIF-Southern Section Division 1 title

University High School’s boys tennis team won its fourth consecutive CIF – Southern Section Division 1 title with a 13-5 victory over Corona del Mar on Friday, May 17 at The Claremont Tennis Club.

There are all results:
University’s #1 Gage Brymer blasted Samee Aboubakare, 6-0; won Alec Adamson, 6-2, and swept out Jonathan Rhone, 6-0.

Gage Brymer University High Schools Boys Tennis Team Won its Fourth Consecutive CIF Southern Section Division 1 title
Tyler Lu (University High School) lost to Alec Adamson, 7-6 (7-3), won Jonathan Rhone, 6-1, and blasted Tyler Gaede, 6-0. Stefan Menichella (University) swept out Jonathan Rhone, 6-1, defeated Samee Aboubakare, 6-2, and won Alec Adamson, 6-3.

In doubles, Drew Dawson/Konrad Kozlowski (University) defeated Josh Kliger/Carson Williams, 6-2, defeated Chaz Downing/Pedro Fernandez, 6-1, and blasted Andrew Nguyen/Paul Kacik, 6-0. Issei Hasegawa/Matt Maddox (University) lost to Downing/Fernandez, 6-2, Billy Lee/Arseni Yalouskikh lost to Bjorn Hoffman/Andrew Nguyen, 6-4, Garrett Kurtz/Michael Chang (University) lost to Kliger/Williams, 6-2. Eric Tseng/Arash Hafezi (University) defeated Kliger/Williams, 6-4, won  Downing/Fernandez, 6-3, and blasted Hoffman/Nguyen, 6-1.

Congratulations to University boys tennis team!

Myths and True about College Tennis Recruiting

This article “College Tennis Spotlight: The Five Myths of College Recruiting” for New York Tennis Magazine was written by Eric Rebhuhn, Men’s Head Tennis Coach, St. John’s University. It is always useful to get information about college tennis from the university tennis coach.

1. Junior players should write long e-mails to college coaches
From the player’s perspective, he/she wants to introduce themselves to their prospective coach, and nowadays, it seems that e-mail is the easiest way to communicate with coaches. Long e-mails are considered more than three paragraphs.

The reality is that coaches are extremely busy, therefore, a short introductory e-mail is best with pertinent information, including name, rankings, GPA and SAT scores. After a month or so, then follow up with another e-mail. Then wait and see if you get a response. Keep in mind that many coaches are receiving in upwards of 50 e-mails per week from potential recruits.

2. Junior players need to focus on their rankings more than developing an all-court game
Many times, the top juniors focus so much of their energy attaining rankings believing the college coach is always looking for the highest ranked player. The truth is that coaches want players who are able to win in singles as well as doubles. Most college coaches want players who can play the net and have the ability to serve and volley. But most personal coaches, parents and players are too focused on the “win now” mentality, believing that the college coach only uses rankings as an indicator. Overall, college coaches take many variables into account when deciding on who they want to recruit.

John Isner Myths and True about College Tennis Recruiting

3. Receiving a scholarship does not always indicate a full scholarship
Many times, juniors hear that a particular player received a scholarship to a particular university and the assumption is that it is a full scholarship. For Men’s Division I, the scholarship allotment is 4.5, which means that the coach usually divides that amount amongst the players on the team. But since there are usually eight players, each player receives a different amount; usually based on the number they play on the team. For Women’s Division I with eight full scholarships, the scholarships cannot be divided!

4. The most important ranking criteria is the USTA ranking, Tennis Recruiting, or ITF ranking?
One of the most important parts of the recruiting process is the ranking. Obviously, the ranking serves as a baseline measurement to a players ability. But is one ranking more important than another? When evaluating a player, the most valuable area is who the player beat and when they beat them. Some players play great locally but struggle nationally, while others thrive when they are playing away from home. All of these factors are taken into consideration when recruiting a certain player. In addition, players who play in ITF events will give the coach another variable that will help in the recruiting process. Overall, all three types of rankings are used by the college coach in the recruiting process.

5. Junior players should not play on their high school team if there are conflicts with sectional, national or international tournaments
College coaches like players to play for their high school team to understand how the team dynamic works. Tennis is an individual sport, but in college, the team is where a player spends the most time and teams that come together are more likely to succeed than a bunch of individuals. When the match is on the line, you want your teammate to fight for that point just as much as you would. The camaraderie that is established in a team environment is essential for all players to learn as early as possible. If a conflict occurs, try to work it out with the school so that not only is the player helping the team, but the school is helping the player succeed off the court.

Tennis Player Thomas Drouet Left with Broken Nose after Bernard Tomic’s Dad Headbutts Him

It is sad to say, but it is true that some tennis parents can be described as crazy tennis parents. Here is a story about the classic example of a crazy tennis parent.

Read this article “Father Barred From Receiving Credentials for ATP Events”  by Christopher Clarey from New York Times and express your opinion.

The ATP, the governing body of the men’s tennis Tour, announced Tuesday that it had barred John Tomic, the coach and father of the rising Australian player Bernard Tomic, from receiving credentials at all of its events until further notice.

John Tomic Tennis Player Thomas Drouet Left with Broken Nose after Bernard Tomics Dad Headbutts Him

John Tomic has been charged with assaulting his son’s hitting partner, Thomas Drouet, in Madrid last week. Drouet has said that John Tomic broke his nose and knocked him unconscious with a head butt outside their Madrid hotel Saturday after a series of disagreements over the terms of his employment.

Tomic disputed the charge at a hearing Monday in Madrid, claiming that he was acting in self-defense and that he delivered the head butt only because Drouet was holding his arms. Another hearing was set for May 14.
Thomas Drouet Tennis Player Thomas Drouet Left with Broken Nose after Bernard Tomics Dad Headbutts Him
But the ATP, which had revoked John Tomic’s credentials for the tournament in Madrid taking place this week, decided to extend the ban.

“Following last week’s incident in Madrid concerning John Tomic, and the ensuing investigation, Mr. Tomic’s credential privileges have been suspended at all ATP tournaments until further notice,” the ATP announced. “The ATP’s investigation into this incident remains ongoing.”

The ATP said the ban applied only to its events. Bill Babcock, director of the Grand Slam Committee, said that he expected each of the four Grand Slam tournaments to make its own decision about whether to issue John Tomic a credential. The French Open begins May 26: Wimbledon on June 24.

“We’re waiting to hear the full report from the ATP,” Babcock said. “And then the Grand Slams will discuss it and each Grand Slam will make an accreditation decision or access decision one by one.”

John Tomic, a largely self-taught tennis player and former cabdriver who was born and raised in the former Yugoslavia before emigrating to Australia, has also been accused by Drouet of hitting Bernard Tomic, a 20-year-old currently ranked 53rd, at a training session in Monaco last Tuesday.

“I want to make it understood that this man is violent and dangerous,” Drouet said in an extensive interview published Tuesday in the French sports newspaper L’Equipe. “Unpredictable, too.”

Drouet said he and another witness, whom he did not name, saw John Tomic punch Bernard Tomic in the head.

“Bernard was bleeding around the mouth, the teeth; there was blood on the court,” Drouet told L’Equipe. “All that because Bernard had told him that he had had enough of hearing his criticisms. I didn’t intervene as I have read I did other places. Afterward, John took Bernard’s three rackets and destroyed them. Bam. Bam. Bam. A half-hour later, he was joking with Bernard.”

Drouet, who has worked for the Tomics since late last year, said in the interview that he was coming forward to help Bernard Tomic and in the hope that tennis authorities would bar John Tomic from the circuit.

“Bernard has been a victim of his father forever,” Drouet said in the interview. “Many times, I’ve heard Bernard tell John he didn’t want him on the court. After that, it’s difficult for Bernard because he’s only known this way of working. He’s a hostage, and he’s developed Stockholm syndrome.”

John Tomic could not be reached to respond to Drouet’s accusations about the attack on Bernard Tomic in Monaco. Telephone messages left for his Spanish lawyer, Carmen Dieguez, were not immediately returned.

Todd Woodbridge, head of professional tennis at Tennis Australia, said that he had not witnessed any physical abuse of Bernard Tomic by his father during his time around the family. “No, if we’d have done so, obviously with Bernard, as a minor, we would have had to take action,” Woodbridge said.

Woodbridge said it was important not to rush to judgment but also important for Tennis Australia to offer increased support in terms of coaching and counseling to Bernard Tomic.

“I think it’s really important that we let everything else play itself out with John,” Woodbridge said. “Given what’s been reported, it’s serious, and it needs to be done by the courts. The other side of this is Bernard’s welfare, and we need to make sure he can cope with the stress and duress this is putting him under. From a tennis perspective, which is a priority, we’ll make sure he has a team around him that can help him get above this distraction the next two months, because it’s a big part of the season. May, June, July is a massive time in tennis.”

Woodbridge said his understanding was that Bernard Tomic, despite the disruptions, still intended to play the event in Rome next week. He said Joshua Eagle, the Australian Davis Cup coach, had been in Madrid and would be in Rome and had spoken with Bernard Tomic directly. He said others from Tennis Australia had been in contact with Bernard Tomic by phone and text.

“He doesn’t give much away,” Woodbridge said. “I think obviously he would rather not have the distraction, but it is what it is.”

The Tomic family, who moved to Australia when Bernard was 3, has long generated tension in the tennis community.

In 2008, during a satellite tournament, John Tomic was so upset with the umpiring that he ordered his son to leave the court in a match against his fellow Australian Marinko Matosevic. Bernard Tomic was later suspended from tournament play for a month by the I.T.F.

In 2009, John Tomic reacted angrily to Craig Tiley, the Australian Open tournament director, when Bernard was scheduled for a night match. John Tomic has also threatened to have his son begin representing Croatia instead of Australia.

Bernard Tomic has been disciplined for misbehavior, including questionable efforts on court and as part of the Australian Davis Cup team. There have been disputes with the police over traffic violations and his role, if any, in a brawl in a Queensland resort last year.

In December, Australia’s Davis Cup captain, Patrick Rafter, announced that Tomic would be suspended from the team’s match against Taiwan in February. Tomic’s financial support from Tennis Australia, the sport’s governing body, was also temporarily cut. He has since returned to the team.

There also have been hints of tension within the Tomic family, the most public coming in April during a match in Miami against David Ferrer when Bernard Tomic asked the chair umpire Cedric Mourier if his father could be removed from the stadium because of his behavior.

“He’s annoying me; I know he’s my father, but he’s annoying me,” Tomic told Mourier, who responded by giving Bernard Tomic a warning for receiving coaching from his father.

Other coaches have received extended bans for abusive behavior. Jim Pierce, the father and coach of the former French Open champion Mary Pierce, was banned from the WTA tour in 1993 after a series of incidents, including a fistfight with Dutch spectators. Damir Dokic, father and coach of the Australian player Jelena Dokic, was banned indefinitely from WTA tour events. Arsalan Rezai, the father and coach of the French player Aravane Rezai, was banned indefinitely from the women’s tour in 2011.

But parental bans have been much rarer on the men’s circuit. Woodbridge said whatever the result of John Tomic’s court appearance, he hoped Bernard Tomic would take greater control of his own career.

“I think this potentially has escalated it and brought it forward, but I do think at some stage Bernard was getting to a point where he wanted to make decisions himself, be it scheduling or training and how much he wanted to put in,” Woodbridge said. “Moving forward, this gives him a chance to become Bernie, his own man.”

Optimal Training Schedule for a Strong and Ambitious Junior Tennis Player

There is the third part of the interview with Chris Lewis, a tennis coach of some American strongest young tennis players. Today we are talking about an optimal training schedule for powerful juniors.
Chris Lewis Wimbledon Final 1983 Optimal Training Schedule for a Strong and Ambitious Junior Tennis Player
From your point of view, what is an optimal training schedule for a 15-17 year old tennis player who wants to play at a high level?

First of all, the development of a player involves five main areas of training: individual coaching, drilling, practice matches, off court training and tournament play. I will address these areas one at a time.

1. Individual coaching

By the time a tennis player is 15, he or she should have mature strokes with the technical aspects of each stroke well in place. When it comes to technique, if the coaching has been competent, all that should be required at this stage is polishing and fine tuning.

With the technical foundation in place, strategic advice should play a major role in the coach/player relationship. I would like to stress, though, that strategic advice should play a major role in the coach player relationship no matter what the stage of development or the age of the student. As the player develops and, subsequently, the context and structure of points and matches change, so should the strategic advice.

Further to technical and strategic advice, coaching should also involve management advice; e.g., the ratio of time spent on development versus time spent playing competitively, which tournaments to play etc.

2. Drilling

The benefits of drilling with a player or players of similar ability should not be overlooked. It is a very useful extension of individual coaching insofar as it gives the coach an opportunity to orchestrate practice in such way that players can work on things that they otherwise can’t work on. For instance, the benefits of the universally popular 2 on 1 drill are self-evident, as are drills that involve, say, four tennis players all in close at the net working on reflex volleys, or countless other drills that are set up to simulate point situations.

3. Practice matches

Practice matches give players the opportunity to work on aspects of their game in point play without the pressure of negative consequences where winning or losing counts. As such, they are an integral part of the development of any tennis player. Further, although they are not a substitute for tournament matches, they do prepare players for tournaments insofar as they will assist in getting players “match ready”. They are also extremely useful as a means of developing strategic expertise, particularly if a coach is there to observe and assist in such things as shot selection and tactics.

4. Off court training

As with on court training, off court training should be customized to suit each player’s individual needs. Just as each player has different strengths and weaknesses in their own court game, so too does each player when it comes to their physical strengths and weaknesses.

On a physical level, tennis demands such things as speed, agility, explosiveness, quick reflexes, good hand-eye coordination, stamina, balance, flexibility and strength. There are countless ways of improving each of these areas with a well thought out program that caters to individual requirements.

As a general rule, the more advanced a player becomes, the more there should be a tendency toward increasing the ratio of off court work to on court work. For example, it would not be appropriate for a twelve year old who hasn’t yet established a sound technical foundation to sacrifice an hour’s work on developing a kick serve to spending an hour doing plyometrics. However, for a seventeen year old with a huge serve and relatively mature game who is losing matches due to lack of fitness, an hour a day spent on off court training would probably be a far better use of his time than to be hitting three hundred serves a day instead of one hundred.

5. Tournament play

Tournament matches should play a big part in the development of every player. Nowhere do strengths and weaknesses become more evident than during competitive play. Whether it involves the technical, the strategic, the mental or the physical aspects of a player’s game, it is during the pressure imposed by match play that identifying these strengths and weaknesses is easiest. The knowledge derived from observing performance under pressure is an essential part of the continued development of a player’s game. They are the best means of benchmarking progress as results are 100 per cent objective. They don’t lie. They let a tennis player and coach know where things stand, and what response is required.

From a developmental perspective, I have found that for a player to get the most out of tournament play, his or her win/loss ration should be in the vicinity of 80/20. Nothing motivates a tennis player more than the satisfaction of winning; however, if a young player never loses, what often happens is that complacency sets in and the player becomes less and less receptive to advice that will help in the longer run.

Now, for 15-17 year old tennis players, the question asked is how much time should be devoted to each of the above categories if optimal development is the goal?

While the balance of time spent on one category or categories will vary from individual to individual, by the time a player is 15 or 16, in an ideal world where finance was not an issue and the ultimate goal was a high level pro career, here is what I would recommend:

- Individual Coaching – 8-10 hours per week.

- Drilling – 8-10 hours per week.

- Practice Matches – 2-3 per week.

- Off Court Training – 5-8 hours per week.

- Tournaments – 16-18 per year.

Finally, if you are reading this, I invite you to add your own thoughts about the optimal training schedule for strong junior tennis players. I find this topic to be a fascinating one so please share your ideas in the comments section. I will look forward to reading them.

If you like the article Like TennisConsult.com on Facebook. Thank you!

Top Junior Tennis Academies in the U.S

I know that the merits of a tennis academy are huge, especially for talented players who need absolute focus and immersion in the game. Whilst I may be more in favor of a private tennis coach or pro teaching junior players, there are some academies that come highly recommended and have produced quality players with all round strengths.

A tennis academy combines schooling and boarding with tennis and it keeps kids focused on both the game and their education. A parent’s time is then also freed up and you do not have to spend hours waiting for training to end, or watch endless matches when you would rather enjoy your own recreational activities such as gaming at top sites like www.androidcasino.ca .

Considering factors such a reputation, highly qualified coaches, location, player development and future opportunities I have created a list of the top rated junior tennis academies across the US for consideration for your kids.

Saviano High Performance Tennis Academy is located in Plantation, FL and its motto of “There’s no substitute for proven” is very apt. Over 29 years, Nick Saviano has coached and developed more than 50 ATP & WTA players, Grand Slam winners, World #1’s; Junior Wimbledon, US Open, French Open and Italian Open Champions, 24 USTA National Junior Champions, 8 Foreign National Junior Champions and more than 25 ITF Junior Champions, including Sunshine Cup, Orange Bowl and Eddie Herr winners.

Evert Tennis Academy is in Boca Raton, FL and has a partnership with the world’s most powerful company in the sports industry, IMG. This partnership affords your kids better opportunities and opens more doors in the tennis world. With a history of developing strong tennis players, Evert’s past pupils include Madison Keys and Peng Shuai.

Nick Bollettieri Junior Tennis Academy (NBTA) is the most famous academy in the U.S. and the pressure on kids to perform is immense. This tennis academy is only suited to kids who are truly gifted and passionate, and players such as Andre Agassi and Venus and Serena Williams have trained here. The track record for producing world class players is unbeatable and junior players must be prepared to be built as a brand that will be backed by IMG.

All of these tennis academies have their merits and as parents it’s suggested you do some further research to determine which option is best suited to your kid’s educational and sporting needs.